tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-555835656466815511.post4897086813103487054..comments2023-08-21T08:55:54.875-05:00Comments on Peter Reviews Products & Procedures: Negative Equity, Recovery & MobilityPeter Melzerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10404231990274257867noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-555835656466815511.post-54329255095424873272013-12-14T06:55:08.194-06:002013-12-14T06:55:08.194-06:00Thank you very much for your cogent advice. When I...Thank you very much for your cogent advice. When I started out publishing, I was naive about layouts and chose randomly from google's suggestions. The sister site to this blog <a rel="nofollow">href="http://www.brainmindinst.blogspot.com" Peter's Blog</a>shows a different layout.<br /><br />Because of the greatly varying number of pictures in each post and different default font sizes among browsers, it is difficult to find a ubiquitously satisfying compromise.Peter Melzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10404231990274257867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-555835656466815511.post-88139207748860331032013-12-14T00:40:30.432-06:002013-12-14T00:40:30.432-06:00I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This ...I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This paragraph posted at this web site is truly fastidious.<br /><br /><br />my webpage; <a href="http://levibarnett.edublogs.org/" rel="nofollow">revetement de sol liege</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-555835656466815511.post-74447334345730821702013-12-11T23:55:09.968-06:002013-12-11T23:55:09.968-06:00I was curious if you ever thought of changing the ...I was curious if you ever thought of changing the page <br />layout of your site? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.<br /><br />But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.<br />Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or 2 images.<br />Maybe you could space it out better?<br /><br />Look at my homepage <a href="http://sett.com/themelodicparrot/user/1255455" rel="nofollow">revetement de sol</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-555835656466815511.post-46436148413585585062013-12-10T05:40:08.396-06:002013-12-10T05:40:08.396-06:00This is a very good tip especially to those fresh ...This is a very good tip especially to those fresh to <br />the blogosphere. Simple but very accurate information… Thank <br />you for sharing this one. A must read post!<br /><br /><br /><br />Also visit my site; <a href="http://bigsight.org/josephadams" rel="nofollow">fenetre pvc alsace</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-555835656466815511.post-21602462082698880072010-04-28T21:37:50.962-05:002010-04-28T21:37:50.962-05:00Thank you very much for your kind feedback. The re...Thank you very much for your kind feedback. The result of the depreciation, that is the present value of the home in percent of the purchase price, was to be entered into the formula. This may have been misleading, and I apologize. <br />To disambiguate, I changed the formula. Now, the loss in value in percent needs to be entered. That is, if the home had lost 95 percent of its original value (enter 95), you would have to wait for more than half a century to recoup your investment, closing costs and property taxes excluded. If the home did not depreciate at all, that is 0 percent (enter 0), ten years of appreciation would still be necessary to offset the cost of borrowing.<br />I hope that makes more sense, PeterPeter Melzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10404231990274257867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-555835656466815511.post-34681643756277039172010-04-28T18:04:33.664-05:002010-04-28T18:04:33.664-05:00think you need to check your math or list assumpti...think you need to check your math or list assumptions on closing costs.<br /><br />if i enter 95% result is 10.24 years. 100% 9.41 yearsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com